Larry Flynt

LarryFlynt.com > Political Articles

THE WALL STREET BANKSTERS

“It is well enough that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system for, if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” Henry Ford

Report by Tyler Downey

Financial catastrophe. Double-digit unemployment. Home foreclosures. An everwidening gulf between the extremely rich and the rest of us. Control of government and media in the hands of a select group of elites. Wall Street destroying the middle class. Are these the harsh realities that face Americans today? Absolutely. But they’ve always been offshoots of crony capitalism, which has a long history of wreaking havoc on this country. Whether it was the railroad bubble of 1893, the rampant financial malfeasance of the Roaring Twenties that led to the Great Depression, the dot-com crash of the late 1990s or the current real estate-driven mess we find ourselves in now, Wall Street speculation and corruption have been at the heart of America’s economic crises.

It takes an extremely courageous and patriotic leader to stand up to the Wall Street banking cartels. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was such a man. When he was elected President in 1932, America was beset by the worst financial crisis it had ever known. Despite assurances from the bankers that the Federal Reserve System (formed in 1913) would forever prevent the panics and economic upheaval that had previously struck the country, the Great Depression of the 1930s nearly wiped out the American middle class.

Seeing the damage inflicted by an outof- control Wall Street, FDR took drastic steps to curb the bankers’ influence. “We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace—business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering,” he declared during a campaign speech at New York City’s Madison Square Garden in 1936. “They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me— and I welcome their hatred.”

The robber barons certainly didn’t want Roosevelt, a Democrat, reelected. Once FDR took office in 1933, chief counsel Ferdinand Pecora—a former New York City prosecutor—was given the green light to rev up the Senate Banking Committee’s investigation into the practices that had triggered the Stock Market Crash of 1929. Pecora ultimately concluded: “Had there been full disclosure of what was being done in furtherance of these schemes, they could not long have survived the fierce light of publicity and criticism. Legal chicanery and pitch darkness were the banker’s stoutest allies.”

Pecora uncovered stock offerings at discounted prices to politicians, the selling of bad loans to unsuspecting investors and the fact that J.P. Morgan Jr. and his partners had paid no income taxes in 1931 and 1932. The president of Citigroup was forced to resign. As Ron Chernow explained in a 2009 New York Times article, it was Pecora’s inquiry that paved the way for the legislation that followed.

Franklin D. Roosevelt first ordered the Treasury Department to close all banks that had been reckless with people’s money. There would be no bailout for them. He then signed into law the Banking Act of 1933, better known as the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated investment and commercial banking. No longer could banks speculate with money that customers had deposited into their private accounts.

FDR also pushed legislation making it much harder for banks to repossess family homes and farms. He instituted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which safeguarded depositors’ accounts and thus restored public confidence in the nation’s banks. FDR introduced regulation into nearly every sector of the economy— energy, labor, trade—to ensure that the middle class was protected from the predations of crony capitalism.

In his 1944 State of the Union address, Roosevelt even proposed an Economic Bill of Rights. “To assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness,” it basically stipulated that no citizen should be denied employment (with a living wage), “a decent home,” “adequate medical care,” “a good education” and social security. It also called for an end to monopolies and cartels. Unfortunately, FDR died before this great goal could be realized, but his bold actions led to an unprecedented 50 years of prosperity for the American middle class.

Of course, Wall Street would fight back. appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob. Never before in all our history have these forces been so united Abetted by massive campaign donations, media consolidation and good old-fashioned corruption, the robber barons have waged a 75-year war on the policies of FDR.

The tide turned in Wall Street’s favor with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. It was his administration that first allowed financiers to write laws that their servants on Capitol Hill enacted. How did the politicians become captives of the ruling class? Since 1990 the financial sector has spent over $2.5 billion on campaign donations alone, not including the astronomical amount spent on lobbying.

This is far and away the most money donated by a single industry—and it’s going to Republicans and Democrats! That’s why it’s impossible to differentiate between Ronald Reagan’s “deregulation” policies and those of Democrat Bill Clinton. Both Presidents were bought and paid for by Wall Street bankers. According to bestselling author Charles Geisst, the culmination of this silent war against the legacy of FDR was the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999. Thanks to Clinton, the robber barons came back in full force, and it took less than ten years to see the result of those efforts.

The Federal Reserve’s record-low interest rates had spawned a colossal real estate bubble. Freed from the regulations of FDR, Wall Street investment firms issued riskier and riskier loans. By 2008 the corrupt system became untenable. Ordinary Americans lost $17 trillion in retirement savings, announced Treasury Department chief economist Alan Krueger. When it all came crashing down, the bankers threatened to destroy the entire financial system if they didn’t get paid off.

Democrat Barack Obama was elected with a mandate to again make government work for the people, not Wall Street. However, his campaign received nearly $40 million in contributions from Wall Street entities. It appears that despite his promises and speeches, Obama is just another politician bought and paid for by the financial industry.

Even after securing his party’s Presidential candidacy in 2008, Obama supported President George W. Bush’s decision to hand over $700 billion of American taxpayer money—with no claw-backs, no oversight and no controls—to bail out Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, AIG and other firms. The recipients then spent about $114 million of our tax money in campaign donations in 2008 alone. They also planned to dole out roughly $14 billion in bonuses to executives.

…. Continues in HUSTLER Magazine – May 2011

Tags: ,

8 Responses to “THE WALL STREET BANKSTERS”

  1. Steven Pata Says:

    Dear Larry,
    I just wanted to thank you for sacrificing many parts of your life for my freedom and the right to pursue happiness.

  2. Anthony Weaver Says:

    It is too bad our country has no leaders today that will stand up against corporate America. Obama made a lot of campain promises and yet has bowed down to the Republicans and their narrow-minded agenda (or should I say the Tea Party as it seems the Republicans are the puppets of the Tea Party).
    The big bank bailouts that George W. Bush rammed down the publics throats was to stimulate lending and try to reduce some of the foreclosures. Instead that money went to buying up other banks, such as the PNC buyout of National City Bank. National City was never offered any of the “stimulus” money.
    While the banks were buying up other banks and giving their executives bonuses, the people of this country found out that the banks were giving fewer loans and making it harder for a middleclass worker to get a loan. This was directly opposite what we were told in providing the stimulus package. Those banks who have received the “stimulus” have been refusing to repay that money as promised. Who will the government hire as a collection agent to recover those funds from the lenders? Seems like this issue has been swept under the carpet lately.
    Today we have no one that will stand up against Congress and the corporations for the disappearing middle class. Istead of progressing to keep up with the times, we are instead going backwards, back to debetor’s prisons, company stores that keep people in debt their entire lives. We have become a laughing stock for the more progressive countries of the world.
    There is a class war coming in this country. It has already happend in England and will not be long before it happens here. The silent flock needs a leader to represent them and to send strong messages to Congress, Democrats, Republicans, and Tea Party that we are fed up with their crap. Its time for the middleclass to be heard or forever silenced.

  3. Matt Kennedy Says:

    It’s been my pleasure to join Larry Flynt for dinner on a single occasion, and though the final game of the NBA finals was playing on the tv set in the four seasons, I was absolutely rapt by Larry’s conversation as we headed into the 2008 election. Already he was suspect of the Hope that was in the air, and it has taken me until now to recognize the power of his prophecy. Long live Flynt!

  4. Alexandra Loria Says:

    Another excellent commentary – thought provoking, insightful and intelligent.

  5. Dave O'Connor Says:

    I just heard Larry on the Thom Hartmann show. Great interview. I plan to buy the new book One Nation Under Sex.

    Oh, lucky for me… I see an “order now!” button. I think I’ll click it.

    Good job, Larry!

  6. Mark Says:

    But when is enough enough? Are Americans simply void of the spirit that created this country? We dont seem to have a boiling point anymore and just shuffle around occasionally complaining and glancing over our shoulders. When taxpayer money pays off the banks that have bankrupted our country and then these same banks – turn around as they walk out the door and say “oh , by the way I’ll take your house too.” and the country allows it? It is tough to imagine that the water ever boils. People should fire a shot over the bankers heads by halting any and all payments on credit cards, mortgages etc. We could cripple them if the majority had the will to do it. Just say no and tell them all to go f–k themselves. I would. Actually I have. But alone, well, it still feels good. Good writing.

  7. Monkey114 Says:

    I was at a family’s house this week-end and I didn’t see Mr. Flynt’s twitter of June 30 until today, had I seen it I would have mentioned this article in addition to the Michael Moore movie and David of the internet would not have needed to ask me to say what I told…

  8. Jim Says:

    I realize the article I am addressing is over 4 months old. I was surfing to see if Larry Flynt was still alive. What caught my eye was, “It takes an extremely courageous and patriotic leader to stand up to the Wall Street banking cartels. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was such a man.” Since it is so obvious that this is a blatant falsehood, I realize that you were deliberately lying. Either that or you are less intelligent than “W”! Perhaps you could tell me, “WHY?” Are you paid to disseminate propaganda? Are you providing one of the polarities of a particular dialectic? Does it pay well? I was just wondering what your price for serving Big Brother is? How much money, opiates, benzodiazepines, alcohol, cocaine, or whatever your toxin of choice is, did it require for you to imply that FDR opposed the “Wall Street banking cartels”? Stand up to them? Maybe you meant to write “stand up FOR them when they entered the room in an ingratiating display of subservience”. Being on his knees rather than his feet was his preferred posture.

    Roosevelt carried out the interests of the bankers, as did Wilson and Hoover, helping consolidate the control of the Federal Reserve, the purpose of which was to hand over control of this nations’ currency to a private entity. Something that had been successfully resisted since Andrew Jackson crippled the Second Bank of the United States. The Fed was promoted by other “courageous and patriotic men”, like Paul Warburg, Senator Nelson Aldrich, and Woodrow Wilson, and sold by politicians and journalists who claimed it would prevent the financial disaster that happened in 1929 and the ensuing decade. But then, you know all this. So, the question remains: how much are you compensated for selling out the citizens of this nation? Do you believe that the lies you promote are in the best interests of the posterity of this nation and that the “end justifies the means”? Maybe you should write an essay on how the citizenry of this nation can resist an un-elected 5th column, like journalists and federal judges, from gaining such power and what legal sanctions should be imposed on them? I mean, isn’t “democracy” important to people like you? I was just curious. Does “bearing false witness” beat working for a living?

larry flynt's book